Why Blocking a Photographer After a Licensing Breach Is Not Okay
- Loz
- Mar 5
- 2 min read
Updated: Mar 6

I want to take a moment to address something that happens far too often in the photography industry, and it needs to be spoken about openly.
When you purchase images under a Personal Use Licence, that licence clearly outlines what you can and cannot do with those images. Personal use means exactly that — not for business, not for advertising, not for websites, not for marketing, and not for anything that generates income or promotes a commercial activity.
Using those images commercially without the correct licence is copyright infringement. It is illegal. It is also incredibly disrespectful to the photographer who created the work you are benefiting from.
So when a photographer reaches out to kindly point out:
You are using the images outside the licence, and
Here are your options — upgrade to the correct commercial licence, or remove the images,
that is not “being difficult”, “causing drama”, or “picking on you”. That is simply enforcing copyright law and protecting their livelihood.
What is absolutely not okay is this:
continuing to use the images commercially,
refusing to pay for the correct licence, and
blocking the photographer on social media to avoid accountability.
Blocking someone does not erase the infringement. Blocking someone does not remove the evidence. And blocking someone does not magically turn personal‑use images into commercial ones.
Creators notice. Screenshots exist. Timelines exist. Copyright does not disappear because someone hits “block”. License Infringement Fees can be directed for payment using a Cease and Desist (yep! Australian Arts Law covers this)! You can be taken to court for misuse!
Photographers are small business owners. We pour time, money, training, equipment, insurance, skill, and decades of experience into every image we deliver. Licensing is how we protect our work and how we make our income.
So when someone knowingly uses images they didn’t pay to use — then blocks the photographer for raising it — it is not only illegal, it is downright rude.
If you ever find yourself unsure which licence you need, please just ask. Every ethical photographer I know is more than happy to explain it. But what we can’t do is ignore deliberate misuse.
Respect the licence. Respect the creator. Respect the work. It’s that simple.




Comments